Jump to content

Mussina does not make my HOF ballot


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 430
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You wouldn't vote for Pedro?

I would like you to defend that position.

With the ballot going from 10 to 12 names Mussina would make my cut.

Pedro's 219 wins in not a first ballot choice for me.

Biggio's 3060 hits would be ahead on Pedro for me. But Randy is in a class by himself. I'd be happy if he was the only player voted in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pedro's 219 wins in not a first ballot choice for me.

Biggio's 3060 hit would be ahead on Pedro for me. But Randy is in a class by himself. I'd be happy if he was the only player voted in.

Pitching wins is the reason?

Wow.

So you wouldn't have put Drysdale in?

Oh wait...you said first ballot choice.

So you are one of those folks that put extra importance in if a guy makes it on the first ballot or not?

That makes less sense to me then the pitching wins portion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mussina deserves to be in the Hall of Fame. He won't get there this year. Whether he gets enough votes this year to stay on the ballot in future years, or ever gets in, remains to be seen.

I'm not too worried a out the 5% stuff. The HOF process is broken enough that some kind of reform seems inevitable. There are so many overqualified candidates that even a hidebound organization like that will have to make a major overhaul.

The idea that Randy Johnson is the only qualified candidate this year is absolutely ludicrous. It's objectively indefensible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not too worried a out the 5% stuff. The HOF process is broken enough that some kind of reform seems inevitable. There are so many overqualified candidates that even a hidebound organization like that will have to make a major overhaul.

The idea that Randy Johnson is the only qualified candidate this year is absolutely ludicrous. It's objectively indefensible.

They did reform it. They expanded the ballot from 10 to 12 names.

That will fix things.

Folks just need to accept the fact that PED users are already in the hall and vote in the steroid era guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pedro's 219 wins in not a first ballot choice for me.

Biggio's 3060 hits would be ahead on Pedro for me. But Randy is in a class by himself. I'd be happy if he was the only player voted in.

Pedro has a strong case for having the highest peak of any pitcher who ever lived. He has a better resume than probably 90% of current Hall of Famers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pitching wins is the reason?

Wow.

So you wouldn't have put Drysdale in?

Oh wait...you said first ballot choice.

So you are one of those folks that put extra importance in if a guy makes it on the first ballot or not?

That makes less sense to me then the pitching wins portion.

The HOF is all about prestige. Getting in on the first ballot is added prestige. Unanimous vote is the ultimate prestige.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not too worried a out the 5% stuff. The HOF process is broken enough that some kind of reform seems inevitable. There are so many overqualified candidates that even a hidebound organization like that will have to make a major overhaul.

The idea that Randy Johnson is the only qualified candidate this year is absolutely ludicrous. It's objectively indefensible.

I'm on the opposite end of things; I think there's 20 guys on the ballot that deserve to be in. Baseball is such a hard sport to figure out when it comes to the Hall of Fame. I'm convinced that certain guys are drunk or under the influence of something when they fill their ballots out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pedro has a strong case for having the highest peak of any pitcher who ever lived. He has a better resume than probably 90% of current Hall of Famers.

So vote for him. He doesn't make my ballot became to me the Hall is about being good for a long time to be a first rounders. Getting in after the first round is for those that are deserving but don't make that first cut. I have high standards because I think that is what the Hall should be. The best of the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The chances of Cook getting a chance this year are slim and none and slim left town.   Odds are against him getting picked in the Rule 5 too.   Still, he’s the kind of guy who gets a chance somewhere sooner or later.
    • Stark contrast between the numbers for Bowie’s pitching staff and Norfolk’s. Obviously a lot of that is the offensive level at AA/AAA, but I’m curious if any of these ~25/26 year old pitchers in AA are late bloomers and have the requisite stuff to be MLB relievers. We’ve already seen Kade Strowd move up to AAA. Could any of these guys follow suit? They are all rule 5 eligible this offseason, they are going to need to be tested against AAA hitters this year to see if they are potential 40-man additions this offseason. Brandon Young, 25, 1.23 xFIP Zach Peek, 26, 2.25 xFIP Keegan Gillies, 26, 2.54 xFIP Trey McHough, 26, 2.90 xFIP Kyle Brnovich, 26, 3.41 xFIP Alex Pham, 24, 3.53 xFIP Carlos Tavera, 25, 3.70 xFIP Different offensive environment, but the only AAA pitchers with better than a 3.70 xFIP are Povich and Luis Gonzalez. Gillies, Peek and Pham all have inflated ERAs that don’t match their xFIP, so I don’t expect them to get bumped up to AAA anytime soon. But Juan Nunez in A+ is also a fringy prospect who is Rule 5 eligible this offseason and needs to be bumped up to AA, so with the number of poor performers in AAA and strong performers in AA I expect to see some shuffling. Very few from this group will turn out to be MLB pitchers, if any. But you never know what pitchers have MLB quality stuff and just need some kind of adjustment to unlock it. I’ll be paying close attention if the Orioles choose any from this group to be moved up to AAA and/or converted into full-time shorter RP roles in the near future. 
    • Does she prefer Baseball Reference or Fangraphs?
    • But technically Mike Bloomberg is part of the ownership group and he’s far wealthier than Steve Cohen I believe. But again, this is really just a technicality as Bloomberg was just a contributor and won’t significantly invest in the O’s. Still, a wealthy group of individuals on par or better with other MLB owners. 
    • Expected accuracy is different for each umpire apparently. Diaz has an expected accuracy of 91%? He shouldn't be calling games.
    • Hopefully, that long rain delay won’t have a lasting effect on her.
    • This actually makes some sense. If Kremer sticks in the rotation he could also go every 5th day to help manage innings for the others. Only issue is what that does to the bullpen. I could come around to that.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...